(at
jimhines suggestion, I'm cross-posting this post from my blog with some minor modifications. It concerns the SFWA Associate class.)
what services could SFWA provide to make the Associate class more attractive?
First of all, let’s summarize the different membership levels (there are affiliates and the like, but I’m interested here only in the writers levels):
Active: 1 novel sold, or 3 pro short stories published.
Associate: 1 pro short story published.
There are apparently other ways to get Associate, but the short story is probably the most general entrance route.
Membership costs $70 per year. What do you currently, as an Associate, get?
Not a lot:
- the Bulletin — ok, if the actual revamps turns out close to the projected revamps, this could be a very nice bonus to get;
- access to the sff.net private forums;
- access to the online directory;
- access to the sfwa suite at cons (or worldcon, not sure if it’s just the one or the others too).
Let’s address those:
- as an extra, it’s good, as the main pulling point no, no magazine is that good or that necessary.
- if you join an organization and the main benefit on offer is hobnobbing, you’ve joined a country club. Do you play tennis or golf? Or do you intend to write? there’s also an element of information on offer here, which see below.
- ah, Information. See below.
- see country club above.
Those are a few examples, but what it boils down to is this: an Associate pays and in turn receives mingling with people and information. That’s it. That’s what’s on offer. And look, I’m sorry if this sounds harsh, but that’s not good enough. Where are the actual services?
(Active membership doesn’t get that much more, but the main difference is all important: Active Members get a genuine voice in the direction and purpose of the organization. Associate members have a voice in the same way peasants had voices in ancient Greek war councils. Anyone remember that scene from The Illiad? The Ballots, whether for office or story recommendations, belong to the Actives. The Associates have influence and opportunity of token value only. See just mentioned Greek peasant.)
The Social Scene:
yeah, you get access to the private suits and you get to “hang out” with veterans on the private forums. So what? You can do that outside SFWA as well.
I’ll admit this might be a bigger pull to other people than I can fathom; the whole concept of networking is a little distasteful to me. Blurring the lines between friendship, sporadic acquintance contact&chat, and business cannot be healthy. Sometimes, all those can be the same people, but the different concepts shouldn’t be taken as synonymns, in my opinion.
Information:
This is the single biggest item on offer, the Big Pull Card.
To be blunt: Information should never be a bargaining chip. Never. Down that road politics lurks. (obviously, this excludes confidential and private information, but as a general rule in my opinion NO! Never!)
And as far as information goes: maybe once upon a time, but today? It might be a bit harder, but all the info writers need to be succesful is available, is out there, can be found through other sources that cost nothing. Only time. If SFWA possesses super sekrit information you can get only by joining SFWA then . . .well, actually I’d like to know what it is as well!
Other reasons against joining as an Associate:
Money, and what you get for it. Money, and how putting it to use can further your writing career. That’s what it all comes down to. There are better ways to invest that 70 dollars in your future writing career:
- see the workshops (Clarion, Virtual Clarion, James Gunn's online workshop, Odyssey). put that money in the jar and save. Those workshops are expensive but they’re intended to improve your writing. That’s gold.
- If you must have information on the field, use that money and buy a subscription to the Bulletin, and Locus magazine too while you’re at it. You get the good stuff without the…interesting personalities that sometimes accompany information gathering from venues like forums.
- short fiction magazine subscriptions. What better way to find what’s selling, and what better way to learn than to keep reading? How many mags or anthos can you buy for $70?
- Mailing your manuscripts. These things cost money I’ve been told. How many can you mail for $70? There are 18 permanent venues for gaining pro short fiction status. Of those, one is invite only (to the average newbie, or even a lot of Associates? boom, good-bye, see ya when you’re famous! try someone else), at least 7 of the remainder require postal submissions. That leaves 10 at most. And the anthos, but how many open vs closed are there out now? How many open anthologies are published that qualify for pro status? Want your Active Membership? Keep the Associate money and mail out those manuscripts;
- Novels. Don’t a lot of these require postal submissions (aka, money you spend) as well?
- conventions. Tickets. Traveling. Lodging. Costs money.
- the internet. costs money. You can probably get more value for your buck by getting a doman registration, getting a host server and devoting time and attention to your website and various other online presences, some of which requires money to utilize to their maximum potential. Most of these things need to be renewed on an annual basis as well.
When you’re below Active Membership qualifications, there are better ways to spend your money to further your writing career. Much better ways.
A Mentor Programme:
Well, what services can the org provide that would be enticing to Associate level members? Well, first of all, and last of all, it has to be an actual service. Something that only the organization can provide, and I’m going to take a guess here that the number one thing every writer wants (every writer, although in this case particularly neo-pro and semi-pro and newbie) is — to improve their writing.
Enter the Mentor.
Is this idea feasible? I have no idea. Not everyone is suitable for teaching. Some personalities just don’t click. Some are better on their own than being taught.
But I do think there is merit in this idea worth considering and here’s how I see it:
An Active member is paired with between 1-4 Associate members for at least and no more than a year. There is a lot of merit in the idea that you shouldn’t be part of a writing group for longer than two years, and after one year, all those Associates who haven’t yet attained Active membership, can be re-assigned to another Active Mentor and with a new group of Associates. A year allows enough time for everyone to get to know each other, get comfortable, sort out Alpha issues if there are any, and prevents the staleness of over familiarity.
This also allows willing Actives to rotate, and not to be chained down every single year, but rather on alternate years (and there are just not that many Associates that numbers is going to be a problem. You can screen for and provide the best teachers the SF&F fields has, teachers both for writing as well as professional conduct as well as everything there is to know about the business outside what’s written on a fictional page.)
Right there, you have the whole hobnobbing, socializing, networking thing so valuable to so many. You combine it with a system of writing lessons and critiques. These are critiques you’ll receive from a pro and a small group of neo-pros. That’s a pretty high level of critique on your writing to be part of. Right now, Codex is the only group I know of who come close to that high a standard.
Most of all, the Associate/ neo-pro has a veteran on tap/dial-a-pro whenever s/he needs advice. Someone who will either know the answer or know someone who does.
That’s a service I’d give serious consideration to paying for, that would be a big attraction for me personally to join a writer’s group such as SFWA. (HWA has a form of mentor programme, don’t they? does someone know?)
You probably can’t get that for only $70, it’ll probably cost more so the Actives will be compensated for their time as well. I don’t know, the money and the math here are things I don’t know how to evaluate.
This might compete with some of the workshops out there right now, but maybe not. The difference is that the Mentor programme doesn’t just teach writing, it looks at the implementing of those lessons, at the progression of the writer over the course of an entire year. It’s more in-depth and longer.
I’d love to know what everyone else's opinion is, both on this matter and in looking at the memberships services in general.
The other thing I’d like to see is that the writer memberships be re-defined, from the point of view of their entrance mediums. So, instead of Associate and Active, we start looking at novels and short stories, and maybe one day even comics (or graphic novels if you must). Membership catered to the entrance medium.
A post for another day.